↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Regional Science, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
687 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
584 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change
Published in
The Annals of Regional Science, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00168-007-0138-2
Authors

Robert Gilmore Pontius, Wideke Boersma, Jean-Christophe Castella, Keith Clarke, Ton de Nijs, Charles Dietzel, Zengqiang Duan, Eric Fotsing, Noah Goldstein, Kasper Kok, Eric Koomen, Christopher D. Lippitt, William McConnell, Alias Mohd Sood, Bryan Pijanowski, Snehal Pithadia, Sean Sweeney, Tran Ngoc Trung, A. Tom Veldkamp, Peter H. Verburg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 584 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 3%
Netherlands 6 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 534 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 159 27%
Researcher 117 20%
Student > Master 75 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 106 18%
Unknown 71 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 214 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 87 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 7%
Social Sciences 35 6%
Engineering 26 4%
Other 57 10%
Unknown 122 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Regional Science
#32
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,882
of 56,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Regional Science
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.