↓ Skip to main content

Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: the Importance of Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Science, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: the Importance of Strategies
Published in
Foundations of Science, September 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:foda.0000042843.48932.25
Authors

Sami Paavola

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 1%
Portugal 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 124 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 30%
Researcher 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 33 23%
Social Sciences 22 15%
Philosophy 17 12%
Computer Science 13 9%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#101
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,219
of 72,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them