↓ Skip to main content

Good policy follows good science: using criteria and indicators for assessing sustainable biofuel production

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Good policy follows good science: using criteria and indicators for assessing sustainable biofuel production
Published in
Ecotoxicology, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10646-008-0293-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan D. Hecht, Denice Shaw, Randy Bruins, Virginia Dale, Keith Kline, Alice Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 54 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Engineering 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Energy 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#258
of 1,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,681
of 168,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,478 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them