↓ Skip to main content

Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood, National Research Council (2009). Washington, DC: The National Academic Press

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Early Childhood, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood, National Research Council (2009). Washington, DC: The National Academic Press
Published in
International Journal of Early Childhood, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13158-010-0002-x
Authors

Ingrid Pramling-Samuelsson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Early Childhood
#100
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,488
of 93,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Early Childhood
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them