| Title |
Can in vitro assays substitute for in vivo studies in assessing the pulmonary hazards of fine and nanoscale materials?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-008-9471-3 |
| Authors |
Christie M. Sayes, Kenneth L. Reed, Shekhar Subramoney, Lloyd Abrams, David B. Warheit |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 29% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 27% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#288
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,287
of 101,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.