| Title |
Evaluation of extraction methods for quantification of aqueous fullerenes in urine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-010-4465-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Troy M. Benn, Benny F. G. Pycke, Pierre Herckes, Paul Westerhoff, Rolf U. Halden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,750
of 191,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#31
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.