↓ Skip to main content

Nipped in the Bud: Why Regional Scale Adaptive Management Is Not Blooming

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Nipped in the Bud: Why Regional Scale Adaptive Management Is Not Blooming
Published in
Environmental Management, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0244-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Allan, Allan Curtis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Netherlands 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 185 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 20%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 68 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 20%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,616
of 68,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.