Title |
Meeting the Imperative to Improve Physician Well-being: Assessment of an Innovative Program
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0363-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick M. Dunn, Bengt B. Arnetz, John F. Christensen, Louis Homer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 231 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
Researcher | 27 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
Other | 23 | 10% |
Other | 57 | 24% |
Unknown | 52 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 34% |
Psychology | 30 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 11% |
Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,254,039
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,373
of 8,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,363
of 76,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#26
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.