↓ Skip to main content

The comorbidity of personality disorders in eating disorders: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
The comorbidity of personality disorders in eating disorders: a meta-analysis
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40519-016-0345-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Martinussen, Oddgeir Friborg, Phöbe Schmierer, Sabine Kaiser, Karl Tore Øvergård, Anna-Lena Neunhoeffer, Egil W. Martinsen, Jan H. Rosenvinge

Abstract

The present meta-analysis summarized the proportion of comorbid personality disorders (PDs) in patients with anorexia (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), respectively, and examined possible moderating variables. A search of the databases PsychINFO, Embase, and Medline for the period 1980-2016 identified 87 studies from 18 different countries. The mean proportion of PDs among patients with any type of eating disorder (ED) was .52 compared to .09 in healthy controls. There were no statistically significant differences between AN (.49) and BN (.54) in proportions of any PD or PD clusters except for obsessive-compulsive PD (.23 vs .12 in AN and BN, respectively). Both ED diagnoses had a similar comorbidity profile with a high prevalence of borderline and avoidant PDs. Moderator analyses conducted for any ED and any PD yielded significant differences for diagnostic systems with respect to EDs, method for assessing PD as well as patient weight and age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 31 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 74 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 14%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 83 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,911,480
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#451
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,255
of 427,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.