| Title |
Childhood leukemia incidence in the vicinity of La Hague nuclear-waste reprocessing facility (France)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, July 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00051336 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-François Viel, Sylvia Richardson, Patrick Danel, Patrick Boutard, Michèle Malet, Paul Barrelier, Oumédaly Reman, André Carré |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#5,016,753
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#594
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,569
of 20,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.