| Title |
Methodological considerations in developing local-scale health impact assessments: balancing national, regional, and local data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11869-009-0037-z |
| Authors |
Bryan Hubbell, Neal Fann, Jonathan I. Levy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 26% |
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 43% |
| Engineering | 11 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,191,647
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health
#146
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,981
of 98,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.