↓ Skip to main content

Variation at local scales need not impede tests for broader scale patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Variation at local scales need not impede tests for broader scale patterns
Published in
Marine Biology, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-1605-x
Authors

Meegan J. Fowler-Walker, Sean D. Connell, Bronwyn M. Gillanders

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 5%
Colombia 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Australia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Professor 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 62%
Environmental Science 17 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,453
of 58,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.