↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a Telephone-Delivered Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (CanChange) on Health and Behavioral Outcomes in Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of a Telephone-Delivered Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (CanChange) on Health and Behavioral Outcomes in Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 2013
DOI 10.1200/jco.2012.45.5873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L. Hawkes, Suzanne K. Chambers, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Tania A. Patrao, Peter D. Baade, Brigid M. Lynch, Joanne F. Aitken, Xingqiong Meng, Kerry S. Courneya

Abstract

Colorectal cancer survivors are at risk for poor health outcomes because of unhealthy lifestyles, but few studies have developed translatable health behavior change interventions. This study aimed to determine the effects of a telephone-delivered multiple health behavior change intervention (CanChange) on health and behavioral outcomes among colorectal cancer survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 326 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 16%
Student > Master 51 15%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 83 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 19%
Psychology 40 12%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Sports and Recreations 13 4%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 97 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2013.
All research outputs
#818,016
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1,918
of 22,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,090
of 208,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#20
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.