↓ Skip to main content

Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA
Published in
Biological Invasions, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10530-004-5849-z
Authors

Jonathan M. Friedman, Gregor T. Auble, Patrick B. Shafroth, Michael L. Scott, Michael F. Merigliano, Michael D. Freehling, Eleanor R. Griffin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 9%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 105 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 38%
Environmental Science 35 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 7%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,186
of 2,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,237
of 56,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.