↓ Skip to main content

GROUND‐WATER MODELS: VALIDATE OR INVALIDATE

Overview of attention for article published in Ground Water, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GROUND‐WATER MODELS: VALIDATE OR INVALIDATE
Published in
Ground Water, August 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01808.x
Authors

J. D. Bredehoeft, L. F. Konikow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 32%
Student > Master 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 39%
Environmental Science 7 25%
Engineering 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,236,607
of 24,674,353 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#247
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,318
of 62,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#27
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.