| Title |
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Z Buchman, Anita Ho, Daniel S Goldberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| Canada | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 26% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Philosophy | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,081,724
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#33
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,780
of 425,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.