| Title |
Evolution of yields from populations with age-specific cropping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, October 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02285264 |
| Authors |
Richard Law, David R. Grey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#348
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,272
of 14,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them