↓ Skip to main content

Tracking customer progress: A follow-up study of customers of the Georgia Manufacturing Extension Alliance

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Technology Transfer, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Tracking customer progress: A follow-up study of customers of the Georgia Manufacturing Extension Alliance
Published in
The Journal of Technology Transfer, June 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02509644
Authors

Jan Youtie, Philip Shapira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 29%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#79
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,090
of 30,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them