↓ Skip to main content

Behaviour and buoyancy regulation in the deepest-diving reptile: the leatherback turtle

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Biology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behaviour and buoyancy regulation in the deepest-diving reptile: the leatherback turtle
Published in
Journal of Experimental Biology, November 2010
DOI 10.1242/jeb.048207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Fossette, Adrian C. Gleiss, Andy E. Myers, Steve Garner, Nikolai Liebsch, Nicholas M. Whitney, Graeme C. Hays, Rory P. Wilson, Molly E. Lutcavage

Abstract

In the face of the physical and physiological challenges of performing breath-hold deep dives, marine vertebrates have evolved different strategies. Although behavioural strategies in marine mammals and seabirds have been investigated in detail, little is known about the deepest-diving reptile - the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea). Here, we deployed tri-axial accelerometers on female leatherbacks nesting on St Croix, US Virgin Islands, to explore their diving strategy. Our results show a consistent behavioural pattern within dives among individuals, with an initial period of active swimming at relatively steep descent angles (∼-40 deg), with a stroke frequency of 0.32 Hz, followed by a gliding phase. The depth at which the gliding phase began increased with the maximum depth of the dives. In addition, descent body angles and vertical velocities were higher during deeper dives. Leatherbacks might thus regulate their inspired air-volume according to the intended dive depth, similar to hard-shelled turtles and penguins. During the ascent, turtles actively swam with a stroke frequency of 0.30 Hz but with a low vertical velocity (∼0.40 ms(-1)) and a low pitch angle (∼+26 deg). Turtles might avoid succumbing to decompression sickness ('the bends') by ascending slowly to the surface. In addition, we suggest that the low body temperature of this marine ectotherm compared with that of endotherms might help reduce the risk of bubble formation by increasing the solubility of nitrogen in the blood. This physiological advantage, coupled with several behavioural and physical adaptations, might explain the particular ecological niche the leatherback turtle occupies among marine reptiles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 190 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 21%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Other 7 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 52%
Environmental Science 21 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,580,585
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#945
of 9,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,581
of 110,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#12
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.