Title |
Reference values and human biological monitoring values for environmental toxins
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, July 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/s004200050369 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
U. Ewers, C. Krause, C. Schulz, M. Wilhelm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 12% |
Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,855
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#136
of 2,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,833
of 34,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them