↓ Skip to main content

Some standard errors in item response theory

Overview of attention for article published in Psychometrika, December 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Some standard errors in item response theory
Published in
Psychometrika, December 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf02293705
Authors

David Thissen, Howard Wainer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 24%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Mathematics 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Psychometrika
#141
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,014
of 33,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychometrika
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them