↓ Skip to main content

Science indicators as reliable evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Minerva, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Science indicators as reliable evidence
Published in
Minerva, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11024-006-9017-8
Authors

Irwin Feller, George Gamota

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Brazil 2 8%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 19 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 58%
Arts and Humanities 3 13%
Philosophy 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#164
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,192
of 76,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them