| Title |
Physiology of aliphatic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodegradation, June 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00058828 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J. Watkinson, Philip Morgan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 26% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biodegradation
#25
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,975
of 15,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodegradation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them