↓ Skip to main content

Improved Paper Pulp from Plants with Suppressed Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase or Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Improved Paper Pulp from Plants with Suppressed Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase or Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase
Published in
Transgenic Research, October 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020362705497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann O'Connell, Karen Holt, Joël Piquemal, Jacqueline Grima-Pettenati, Alain Boudet, Brigitte Pollet, Catherine Lapierre, Michel Petit-Conil, Wolfgang Schuch, Claire Halpin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#394
of 946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,268
of 49,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them