↓ Skip to main content

Axenic mycorrhization of wild type and transgenic hybrid aspen expressing T-DNA indoleacetic acid-biosynthetic genes

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Axenic mycorrhization of wild type and transgenic hybrid aspen expressing T-DNA indoleacetic acid-biosynthetic genes
Published in
Trees, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/s004680050059
Authors

R. Hampp, M. Ecke, C. Schaeffer, T. Wallenda, A. Wingler, I. Kottke, B. Sundberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 40%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 40%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2006.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#53
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,979
of 26,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them