↓ Skip to main content

Adherence and Acceptability in MTN 001: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Daily Oral and Topical Tenofovir for HIV Prevention in Women

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Adherence and Acceptability in MTN 001: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Daily Oral and Topical Tenofovir for HIV Prevention in Women
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0333-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra M. Minnis, Sharavi Gandham, Barbra A. Richardson, Vijayanand Guddera, Beatrice A. Chen, Robert Salata, Clemensia Nakabiito, Craig Hoesley, Jessica Justman, Lydia Soto-Torres, Karen Patterson, Kailazarid Gomez, Craig W. Hendrix

Abstract

We compared adherence to and acceptability of daily topical and oral formulations of tenofovir (TFV) used as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention among women in South Africa, Uganda and the United States. 144 sexually active, HIV-uninfected women participated in a cross-over study of three regimens: oral tablet, vaginal gel, or both. We tested for differences in adherence and evaluated product acceptability. Self-reported adherence for all regimens was high (94 %), but serum TFV concentrations indicated only 64 % of participants used tablets consistently. Most women in the U.S. (72 %) favored tablets over gel; while preferences varied at the African sites (42 % preferred gel and 40 % tablets). Findings indicate a role for oral and vaginal PrEP formulations and highlight the importance of integrating pharmacokinetics-based adherence assessment in future trials. Biomedical HIV prevention interventions should consider geographic and cultural experience with product formulations, partner involvement, and sexual health benefits that ultimately influence use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 170 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 11 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Social Sciences 21 12%
Psychology 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,393,167
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#486
of 3,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,941
of 182,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#8
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.