↓ Skip to main content

DIFFERENTIAL NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS RETENTION BY FIVE WETLAND PLANT SPECIES

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
DIFFERENTIAL NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS RETENTION BY FIVE WETLAND PLANT SPECIES
Published in
Wetlands, December 2003
DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0979:dnaprb]2.0.co;2
Authors

Jenny T. Kao, John E. Titus, Wei-Xing Zhu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 110 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#7,716,117
of 23,463,424 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#235
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,984
of 134,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,463,424 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them