↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Problem-Based and Conventional Curricula in Nursing Education

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of Problem-Based and Conventional Curricula in Nursing Education
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1014534712178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Rideout, Valerie England-Oxford, Barbara Brown, Frances Fothergill-Bourbonnais, Carolyn Ingram, Gerry Benson, Margaret Ross, Angela Coates

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Professor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 25 29%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Psychology 8 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#451
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,445
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them