↓ Skip to main content

Network approach to the symptom-level association between alcohol use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Network approach to the symptom-level association between alcohol use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00127-016-1331-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad H. Afzali, Matthew Sunderland, Philip J. Batterham, Natacha Carragher, Alison Calear, Tim Slade

Abstract

The high prevalence of alcohol use disorder among individuals with a history of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder is well documented. The current study applied network analysis to map the structure of symptom associations between these disorders. Data come from a community sample of 449 Australian adults with a history of trauma and alcohol consumption during the last 12 months. Data analysis consisted of the construction of the comorbidity network of PTSD/AUD symptoms, identification of the bridging symptoms, computation of the centrality measures, and evaluation of the robustness of the results. Results highlighted two main symptom clusters, corresponding to two disorders, and that only nine edges connected the two clusters. Bridging symptoms connecting the two clusters were: alcohol use in dangerous situations, physical or mental health problems as a result of alcohol use, loss of interest or reduced social activities, and reckless/self-destructive behaviour. Identification of both central symptoms, because of their key role in the constellation and strong associations with majority of symptoms, and bridge symptoms, because of their mediating role between two disorders, has some implications in terms of self-medication and risk-taking/self-regulation theories of comorbidity and provides a number of clinical implications, which warrants further exploration within clinical samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,050,687
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,826
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,364
of 423,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.