| Title |
‘Putting our heads together’: insights into genomic conservation between human and canine intracranial tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11060-009-9877-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachael Thomas, Shannon E. Duke, Huixia J. Wang, Tessa E. Breen, Robert J. Higgins, Keith E. Linder, Peter Ellis, Cordelia F. Langford, Peter J. Dickinson, Natasha J. Olby, Matthew Breen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 33% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,048
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,132
of 94,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.