| Title |
Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-008-9413-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen N. Lohr, Bradley J. Zebrack |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 23% |
| Researcher | 34 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 41% |
| Psychology | 17 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,006
of 3,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,012
of 183,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.