↓ Skip to main content

Requirements for modeling trace metal partitioning in oxidized estuarine sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Chemistry, March 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Requirements for modeling trace metal partitioning in oxidized estuarine sediments
Published in
Marine Chemistry, March 1983
DOI 10.1016/0304-4203(83)90078-6
Authors

Samuel N. Luoma, James A. Davis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 28%
Environmental Science 16 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Chemistry 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Marine Chemistry
#285
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,140
of 7,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Chemistry
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.