↓ Skip to main content

Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin
Published in
Wetlands, September 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf03160876
Authors

James A. Reinartz, elizabeth L. Warne

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 39%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2005.
All research outputs
#5,044,747
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#130
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,545
of 20,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them