↓ Skip to main content

Wetlands restoration and mitigation policies: Comment

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, September 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Wetlands restoration and mitigation policies: Comment
Published in
Environmental Management, September 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf01866758
Authors

H. Thomas Harvey, Michael N. Josselyn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 22%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 56%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#403
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,371
of 10,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.