| Title |
Mechanisms of shrubland expansion: land use, climate or CO2?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, January 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01091640 |
| Authors |
Steve Archer, David S. Schimel, Elisabeth A. Holland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| Argentina | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 343 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 82 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 120 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,837,824
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,057
of 6,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,159
of 77,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.