| Title |
Assessing genetic variation in juvenile white sharks using teeth collected from landfills in Baja California, México
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-016-0589-9 |
| Authors |
Píndaro Díaz-Jaimes, Carol Reeb, Oscar Sosa-Nizhisaki, John B. O’Sullivan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#284
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,100
of 355,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.