↓ Skip to main content

Recovery processes in lotic ecosystems: Limits of successional theory

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, September 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Recovery processes in lotic ecosystems: Limits of successional theory
Published in
Environmental Management, September 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02394721
Authors

Stuart G. Fisher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Professor 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1996.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,305
of 14,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.