↓ Skip to main content

Correlates of Viral Richness in Bats (Order Chiroptera)

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Correlates of Viral Richness in Bats (Order Chiroptera)
Published in
EcoHealth, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10393-009-0263-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy S. Turmelle, Kevin J. Olival

Abstract

Historic and contemporary host ecology and evolutionary dynamics have profound impacts on viral diversity, virulence, and associated disease emergence. Bats have been recognized as reservoirs for several emerging viral pathogens, and are unique among mammals in their vagility, potential for long-distance dispersal, and often very large, colonial populations. We investigate the relative influences of host ecology and population genetic structure for predictions of viral richness in relevant reservoir species. We test the hypothesis that host geographic range area, distribution, population genetic structure, migratory behavior, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) threat status, body mass, and colony size, are associated with known viral richness in bats. We analyze host traits and viral richness in a generalized linear regression model framework, and include a correction for sampling effort and phylogeny. We find evidence that sampling effort, IUCN status, and population genetic structure correlate with observed viral species richness in bats, and that these associations are independent of phylogeny. This study is an important first step in understanding the mechanisms that promote viral richness in reservoir species, and may aid in predicting the emergence of viral zoonoses from bats.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Mexico 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 202 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Student > Master 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Environmental Science 15 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 35 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,013,048
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#179
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,801
of 165,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.