↓ Skip to main content

Probing the diabetes and colorectal cancer relationship using gene – environment interaction analyses

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Probing the diabetes and colorectal cancer relationship using gene – environment interaction analyses
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, June 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41416-023-02312-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niki Dimou, Andre E. Kim, Orlagh Flanagan, Neil Murphy, Virginia Diez-Obrero, Anna Shcherbina, Elom K. Aglago, Emmanouil Bouras, Peter T. Campbell, Graham Casey, Steven Gallinger, Stephen B. Gruber, Mark A. Jenkins, Yi Lin, Victor Moreno, Edward Ruiz-Narvaez, Mariana C. Stern, Yu Tian, Kostas K. Tsilidis, Volker Arndt, Elizabeth L. Barry, James W. Baurley, Sonja I. Berndt, Stéphane Bézieau, Stephanie A. Bien, D. Timothy Bishop, Hermann Brenner, Arif Budiarto, Robert Carreras-Torres, Tjeng Wawan Cenggoro, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Xuechen Chen, David V. Conti, Christopher H. Dampier, Matthew Devall, David A. Drew, Jane C. Figueiredo, Graham G. Giles, Andrea Gsur, Tabitha A. Harrison, Akihisa Hidaka, Michael Hoffmeister, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Kristina Jordahl, Eric Kawaguchi, Temitope O. Keku, Susanna C. Larsson, Loic Le Marchand, Juan Pablo Lewinger, Li Li, Bharuno Mahesworo, John Morrison, Polly A. Newcomb, Christina C. Newton, Mireia Obon-Santacana, Jennifer Ose, Rish K. Pai, Julie R. Palmer, Nikos Papadimitriou, Bens Pardamean, Anita R. Peoples, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Elizabeth A. Platz, John D. Potter, Gad Rennert, Peter C. Scacheri, Robert E. Schoen, Yu-Ru Su, Catherine M. Tangen, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Duncan C. Thomas, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Caroline Y. Um, Franzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Kala Visvanathan, Pavel Vodicka, Ludmila Vodickova, Emily White, Alicja Wolk, Michael O. Woods, Conghui Qu, Anshul Kundaje, Li Hsu, W. James Gauderman, Marc J. Gunter, Ulrike Peters

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 22 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,701,828
of 26,455,955 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#1,411
of 11,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,421
of 386,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#14
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,455,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.