↓ Skip to main content

Effects of herbivory, nutrients, and reef protection on algal proliferation and coral growth on a tropical reef

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Effects of herbivory, nutrients, and reef protection on algal proliferation and coral growth on a tropical reef
Published in
Oecologia, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2174-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas B. Rasher, Sebastian Engel, Victor Bonito, Gareth J. Fraser, Joseph P. Montoya, Mark E. Hay

Abstract

Maintaining coral reef resilience against increasing anthropogenic disturbance is critical for effective reef management. Resilience is partially determined by how processes, such as herbivory and nutrient supply, affect coral recovery versus macroalgal proliferation following disturbances. However, the relative effects of herbivory versus nutrient enrichment on algal proliferation remain debated. Here, we manipulated herbivory and nutrients on a coral-dominated reef protected from fishing, and on an adjacent macroalgal-dominated reef subject to fishing and riverine discharge, over 152 days. On both reefs, herbivore exclusion increased total and upright macroalgal cover by 9-46 times, upright macroalgal biomass by 23-84 times, and cyanobacteria cover by 0-27 times, but decreased cover of encrusting coralline algae by 46-100% and short turf algae by 14-39%. In contrast, nutrient enrichment had no effect on algal proliferation, but suppressed cover of total macroalgae (by 33-42%) and cyanobacteria (by 71% on the protected reef) when herbivores were excluded. Herbivore exclusion, but not nutrient enrichment, also increased sediment accumulation, suggesting a strong link between herbivory, macroalgal growth, and sediment retention. Growth rates of the corals Porites cylindrica and Acropora millepora were 30-35% greater on the protected versus fished reef, but nutrient and herbivore manipulations within a site did not affect coral growth. Cumulatively, these data suggest that herbivory rather than eutrophication plays the dominant role in mediating macroalgal proliferation, that macroalgae trap sediments that may further suppress herbivory and enhance macroalgal dominance, and that corals are relatively resistant to damage from some macroalgae but are significantly impacted by ambient reef condition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 253 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 46%
Environmental Science 63 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,713,464
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#412
of 4,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,885
of 154,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.