| Title |
Parents’ reading-related knowledge and children’s reading acquisition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Dyslexia, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11881-011-0053-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Ladd, Sandra Martin-Chang, Kyle Levesque |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,380,379
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Dyslexia
#16
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,386
of 101,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Dyslexia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them