| Title |
The HELP system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, April 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00995116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. A. Pryor, R. M. Gardner, P. D. Clayton, H. R. Warner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Professor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 23% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#157
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#934
of 8,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them