↓ Skip to main content

Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 High Impact Design Requirements - Key Design Challenges for the Next Decade
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Current and Future Research Directions in Requirements Engineering
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Requirements in the 21st Century: Current Practice and Emerging Trends
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Section 1: Fundamental Concepts of Design
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Evolution of Design Requirements in the Trajectory of Artificiality: A Research Agenda
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Challenges in Requirements Engineering: A Research Agenda for Conceptual Modeling
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Section 2: Evolution and the Fluidity of Design
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 On the Inevitable Intertwining of Requirements and Architecture
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Requirements Evolution and What (Research) to Do about It
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Designs Can Talk: A Case of Feedback for Design Evolution in Assistive Technology
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Section 3: Quality and Value-Based Requirements
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Impact of Requirements Quality on Project Success or Failure
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Designing Value-Based Inter-organizational Controls Using Patterns
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Section 4: Requirements Intertwining
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Exploring the Fitness Relationship between System Functionality and Business Needs
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Framework for Business Process Change Requirements Analysis
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Intertwining of Enterprise Strategy and Requirements
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Managing Legal Texts in Requirements Engineering
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Requirements’ Role in Mobilizing and Enabling Design Conversation
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Design Requirements for Communication-Intensive Interactive Applications
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Requirements Engineering and Aspects
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Section 5: Adapting Requirements Practices in Different Domains
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 On Technology Convergence and Platforms: Requirements Challenges from New Technologies and System Architectures
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Understanding Requirements for Open Source Software
Attention for Chapter 6: A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept
Chapter number 6
Book title
Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective
Published in
ADS, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92966-6_6
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-092965-9, 978-3-54-092966-6
Authors

Ralph, Paul, Wand, Yair, Paul Ralph, Yair Wand

Editors

Kalle Lyytinen, Pericles Loucopoulos, John Mylopoulos, Bill Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 323 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 26%
Student > Master 71 20%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 22 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 60 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 88 25%
Engineering 59 17%
Design 58 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 7%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 67 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,688,066
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#2,919
of 27,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,827
of 189,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#117
of 690 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 690 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.