↓ Skip to main content

VaProS: a database-integration approach for protein/genome information retrieval

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
VaProS: a database-integration approach for protein/genome information retrieval
Published in
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10969-016-9211-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Gojobori, Kazuho Ikeo, Yukie Katayama, Takeshi Kawabata, Akira R. Kinjo, Kengo Kinoshita, Yeondae Kwon, Ohsuke Migita, Hisashi Mizutani, Masafumi Muraoka, Koji Nagata, Satoshi Omori, Hideaki Sugawara, Daichi Yamada, Kei Yura

Abstract

Life science research now heavily relies on all sorts of databases for genome sequences, transcription, protein three-dimensional (3D) structures, protein-protein interactions, phenotypes and so forth. The knowledge accumulated by all the omics research is so vast that a computer-aided search of data is now a prerequisite for starting a new study. In addition, a combinatory search throughout these databases has a chance to extract new ideas and new hypotheses that can be examined by wet-lab experiments. By virtually integrating the related databases on the Internet, we have built a new web application that facilitates life science researchers for retrieving experts' knowledge stored in the databases and for building a new hypothesis of the research target. This web application, named VaProS, puts stress on the interconnection between the functional information of genome sequences and protein 3D structures, such as structural effect of the gene mutation. In this manuscript, we present the notion of VaProS, the databases and tools that can be accessed without any knowledge of database locations and data formats, and the power of search exemplified in quest of the molecular mechanisms of lysosomal storage disease. VaProS can be freely accessed at http://p4d-info.nig.ac.jp/vapros/ .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Computer Science 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,207,054
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#78
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,936
of 428,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them