↓ Skip to main content

The endocrine disruptive effects of mercury

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
The endocrine disruptive effects of mercury
Published in
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02931255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinqiang Zhu, Yukinori Kusaka, Kazuhiro Sato, Qunwei Zhang

Abstract

Mercury, identified thousands of years ago is one of the oldest toxicants known. The endocrine disruptive effects of mercury have recently become one of the major public concerns. In this report, the adverse effects of mercury on the hypothalamus, pituitary, thyroid, adrenal gland, and gonads (testis and ovary) in laboratory animals as well as in humans are reviewed. The effects of both environmental and occupational exposures to organic, inorganic, or metallic mercury are explained. There is sufficient evidence from animal studies supporting the disruptive effects of mercurials on the functions of the thyroid, adrenal, ovary, and testis, although several factors make it difficult to extrapolate the animal data to the human situation. However, the human studies performed so far, which focused mainly on serum hormone levels, failed to provide any conclusive data to confirm the findings from the animal studies. Therefore, further well-designed epidemiological studies are urgently needed. The possible mechanisms of the toxic effects are also discussed. The broad enzyme inhibition and the influence on the combining of hormones by their receptors, which seem due to its avid binding to sulphydryl, may account for the primary mechanism. The interference with intracellular calcium metabolism, and peroxidation may also be involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Unknown 62 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,071,173
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#95
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,593
of 112,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them