↓ Skip to main content

Lost populations and preserving genetic diversity in the lion Panthera leo: Implications for its ex situ conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
37 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
Title
Lost populations and preserving genetic diversity in the lion Panthera leo: Implications for its ex situ conservation
Published in
Conservation Genetics, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10592-005-9062-0
Authors

Ross Barnett, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, Ian Barnes, Alan Cooper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 2%
Brazil 7 2%
India 5 1%
Australia 3 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
United Arab Emirates 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 317 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 19%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 14%
Other 20 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 31 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 210 59%
Environmental Science 62 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 2%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,799,964
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#420
of 1,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,395
of 71,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.