↓ Skip to main content

Is additional oral phosphate supplementation for preterm infants necessary: an assessment of clinical audit

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Is additional oral phosphate supplementation for preterm infants necessary: an assessment of clinical audit
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2040-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stewart Watts, Helen Mactier, June Grant, Eilidh Cameron Nicol, Alexander Balfour Mullen

Abstract

Adequate phosphate intake is important for the prevention of metabolic bone disease in preterm infants. The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition recommends a daily phosphate intake of 184-230 mg/kg/day, which should be met by standard feed volumes of either commercially fortified breast milk or preterm formulae. We sought to investigate whether our local practise of providing supplemental oral phosphate for all infants born before 32 weeks' gestation continues to be necessary. Details of parenteral and milk feeding and both oral and parenteral phosphate supplementation from birth until 8 weeks of age were collected retrospectively from the case notes of 31 preterm infants. Routinely collected biochemical markers of bone mineral status were also recorded. Mean (SD) plasma phosphate concentration was higher when oral phosphate supplementation was given [2.10 (0.38) versus 1.92(0.50) mM/L without supplement (p < 0.001)]. A minimum average phosphate intake of 184 mg/kg/day was achieved by 47 and 77 % of babies in weeks 1 and 2, respectively, and by 84-100 % of infants from week 3. The percentage of plasma phosphate measurements below the minimum target of 1.8 mM/L was greater amongst unsupplemented babies (45 versus 18 %).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,185,533
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,392
of 3,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,661
of 195,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.