You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adaptive Clinical Trials: A Partial Remedy for the Therapeutic Misconception?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2012.4174 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William J. Meurer, Roger J. Lewis, Donald A. Berry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 31% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#4,278,098
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#17,468
of 36,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,259
of 181,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#91
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.