↓ Skip to main content

Mapping and assessing clinical handover training interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping and assessing clinical handover training interventions
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, October 2012
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Slavi Stoyanov, Henny Boshuizen, Oliver Groene, Marcel van der Klink, Wendy Kicken, Hendrik Drachsler, Paul Barach

Abstract

The literature reveals a patchwork of knowledge about the effectiveness of handover and transfer of care-training interventions, their influence on handover practices and on patient outcomes. We identified a range of training interventions, defined their content, and then proposed practical measures for improving the training effectiveness of handover practices.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 103 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Other 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 35 30%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Social Sciences 17 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Psychology 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2,514
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,348
of 192,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#44
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.