↓ Skip to main content

An associative account of Orthographic Satiation in Chinese characters

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
An associative account of Orthographic Satiation in Chinese characters
Published in
Reading and Writing, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11145-016-9693-1
Authors

Jie Yuan, Sarah Carr, Guosheng Ding, Shimin Fu, John Xuexin Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 24%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Linguistics 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,043,787
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#114
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,666
of 326,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.